5 exercises — qualifying claims accurately in code reviews, specs, blog posts, and status updates.
0 / 18 completed
1 / 18
You're presenting a performance benchmark result to stakeholders. Which sentence best uses hedging to qualify your claim?
"tends to be around … in typical … scenarios" is accurate hedging — it acknowledges the result is real while specifying the conditions. Option A over-claims with no qualification. Option C sounds uncertain and informal ("we think"). Option D is over-hedged to the point of being meaningless. Good hedging is precise: it tells the reader under what conditions the claim holds.
2 / 18
In a code review you write: "This approach _____ cause issues under high concurrency." You're not certain — you want to flag a potential problem.
May (and might) signal that something is a possibility worth investigating, not a certainty. Code review comments like "This may cause a race condition", "This approach might not handle edge cases correctly", or "This could lead to memory leaks" are professional and accurate — they flag risk without asserting facts you haven't confirmed.
3 / 18
Which sentence from a technical blog post shows the best hedged claim?
"are widely considered to" is a classic hedging phrase that attributes the claim to the broader community rather than asserting it as absolute fact. This protects the writer's credibility because the claim is nuanced. Useful hedging phrases for technical writing: "is generally accepted that", "research suggests", "in most cases", "under typical conditions", "it appears that", "evidence indicates". Option D over-hedges with both "personally" and "potentially".
4 / 18
Fill in the blank: "It _____ (seem/appears/looks/sounds) that the bottleneck _____ (is/lies/sits) in the database layer based on the current traces."
"It seems that … lies in …" is clean, confident hedging. seems / appears / suggests are impersonal framing verbs that soften a claim without undermining it. Adding "definitely" removes the hedge entirely; adding "maybe" or multiple hedges degrades credibility. The phrase "based on the current traces" further signals that this is a data-based assessment, not speculation — always include your evidence source when hedging.
5 / 18
Your estimation for a feature is uncertain. Which response to "How long will this take?" is most professional?
Professional estimation combines: (1) a basis ("Based on similar work"), (2) a range ("2–4 days" rather than an exact number), (3) a dependency that explains the uncertainty ("depends on the API response shape"). Option A sounds overconfident. Option B is unprofessional. Option D over-hedges — multiple hedges in a single sentence signal confusion, not precision.
6 / 18
During a code review of a new API endpoint, Sarah comments: 'The response time is consistently slow. This likely _____ the network latency.' Which phrasing best demonstrates hedging in this situation?
Sarah's original statement is overly assertive. Using 'definitively' or 'guarantees' implies certainty she doesn't have. 'Probably indicates' acknowledges uncertainty while still suggesting a plausible cause, aligning with hedging language. The other options are too strong and could lead to unnecessary investigation.
7 / 18
You're drafting a Slack message to your team about a newly deployed feature. You want to acknowledge a potential issue without causing alarm. The message reads: 'The new authentication service _____ (seem/appear/look) to be experiencing intermittent errors, but we're monitoring it closely.' What word best completes the sentence while employing hedging language?
'Seems' is a weaker verb than 'is,' allowing for the possibility that the errors are not consistently present. Using 'is' would imply a more definitive observation and potentially raise unnecessary concern among team members. The other options aren't appropriate in this context.
8 / 18
You are writing the description for a Pull Request introducing a change to a database migration script. You want to state that the change *might* have some impact but aren't certain. Which of the following is the most appropriate phrasing?
The key here is to avoid absolute statements. Saying 'could potentially' and adding the caveat of close monitoring demonstrates awareness of potential risks without overstating the certainty of improvement. The other options are overly confident and lack necessary caution.
9 / 18
You're reviewing a colleague's code. They've added a new logging statement: 'This log entry _____ (is/appears) crucial for debugging.' You believe the logging might be overly verbose and potentially impact performance. Which response is most professional and demonstrates hedging?
The phrase 'appears to be helpful' is the most appropriate hedging statement. It acknowledges the colleague's intention without committing to its effectiveness or ignoring potential downsides. The other options are overly enthusiastic and fail to acknowledge the possible performance implications.
10 / 18
During a code review of a new API endpoint, Sarah comments: 'The response time is consistently slow. This likely _____ the network latency.' Which phrasing best demonstrates hedging in this situation?
Sarah's original statement is overly assertive. Using 'definitively' or 'guarantees' implies certainty she doesn't have. 'Probably indicates' acknowledges uncertainty while still suggesting a plausible cause, aligning with hedging language. The other options are too strong and could lead to unnecessary investigation.
11 / 18
You're drafting a Slack message to your team about a newly deployed feature. You want to acknowledge a potential issue without causing alarm. The message reads: 'The new authentication service _____ (seem/appear/look) to be experiencing intermittent errors, but we're monitoring it closely.' What word best completes the sentence while employing hedging language?
'Seems' is a weaker verb than 'is,' allowing for the possibility that the errors are not consistently present. Using 'is' would imply a more definitive observation and potentially raise unnecessary concern among team members. The other options aren't appropriate in this context.
12 / 18
You are writing the description for a Pull Request introducing a change to a database migration script. You want to state that the change *might* have some impact but aren't certain. Which of the following is the most appropriate phrasing?
The key here is to avoid absolute statements. Saying 'could potentially' and adding the caveat of close monitoring demonstrates awareness of potential risks without overstating the certainty of improvement. The other options are overly confident and lack necessary caution.
13 / 18
You're reviewing a colleague's code. They've added a new logging statement: 'This log entry _____ (is/appears) crucial for debugging.' You believe the logging might be overly verbose and potentially impact performance. Which response is most professional and demonstrates hedging?
The phrase 'appears to be helpful' is the most appropriate hedging statement. It acknowledges the colleague's intention without committing to its effectiveness or ignoring potential downsides. The other options are overly enthusiastic and fail to acknowledge the possible performance implications.
14 / 18
Sarah is writing a Slack message to her team about a new monitoring dashboard. She wants to acknowledge that the initial data might be noisy but express confidence in its long-term value. Which sentence best demonstrates hedging in this situation?
'We've just deployed the new monitoring dashboard! The initial readouts are a little rough, but we're already seeing promising trends.'
This question tests understanding of cautious language. The key is that Sarah acknowledges 'rough' data but frames it positively with 'promising trends.' Option A is too strong a criticism and doesn't demonstrate hedging; option B simply asks for action without qualification; option C describes an adequate outcome which isn't what the prompt intended; and option D provides a general positive statement, failing to address the potential issue.
15 / 18
Mark is writing a commit message for a code change. He needs to acknowledge that the fix *might* have unintended consequences. Which phrase best reflects this?
'This commit addresses a potential issue with {code}, but it could introduce new problems.'
This question targets hedging through cautious wording. 'Could introduce new problems' is a classic hedge. Options A and B are overly critical or prescriptive; option C offers a generic positive statement without addressing the uncertainty; and option D uses overly confident phrasing.
16 / 18
You're reviewing a colleague's PR description for a database schema migration. The description states: 'This change should improve query performance.' Which of the following is the MOST appropriate way to hedge this claim?
'This change *may* improve query performance, but further testing is recommended.'
This question focuses on balancing optimism with caution. The inclusion of 'may' and 'further testing' acknowledges uncertainty and encourages a measured approach. Option A is too critical; option B suggests passive monitoring instead of active validation; option C offers a generic positive statement; and option D uses overly confident phrasing.
17 / 18
During a standup update, David says: 'We've implemented the new caching layer. It _____ (seem/appears) to be reducing server load, but we need to monitor it closely over the next few days.'
This question tests hedging through acknowledging a positive observation while simultaneously emphasizing the need for continued scrutiny. The phrase 'appears to be' is a key hedge, recognizing that initial impressions can be misleading. Options A and B are overly prescriptive; option C offers a generic statement without qualification; and option D uses confident phrasing.
18 / 18
Emily is drafting an API response message to inform the client of a potential rate limit. She wants to convey this information politely without alarming the user. Which sentence best demonstrates hedging?
'The API service currently experiences occasional rate limiting due to high demand.'
This question examines hedging through framing a limitation as an 'occasional' occurrence. This acknowledges the problem without assigning blame or suggesting immediate action. Options A and B are overly critical; option C offers a generic positive statement; and option D uses confident phrasing.
What will I practise in "Hedging Language in Technical Communication — Grammar Exercise"?
Practice hedging in code reviews, blog posts, benchmarks, and status updates. 5 interactive exercises for IT professionals.
How many exercises are in this module?
This module has 18 multiple-choice exercises, each with instant feedback and a full explanation of the correct answer.
Is this exercise free to use?
Yes. Every exercise on CoderSlingo, including this one, is free to use with no account, sign-up, or paywall.
Do I need to create an account to do these exercises?
No account is required. Just click an option to answer — your score for this session is tracked automatically in the progress bar above.
What happens if I choose the wrong answer?
You'll immediately see which answer was correct, plus a full explanation covering the grammar rule and reasoning behind it — mistakes are where most of the learning happens.
Can I retry the exercises if I want a higher score?
Yes — use the "Try again" button on the results screen to reset and go through all the questions again.
Is my progress saved if I close the page?
No. Progress is tracked only for your current visit; reloading or leaving the page resets the counter. This keeps the exercise simple and account-free.
Where can I find more Grammar exercises?
Browse the full Grammar hub for related drills, or check the "Next up" link below to continue with a connected topic.
How is this different from reading an article on the same topic?
Articles explain grammar rules in prose; this exercise tests and reinforces those rules through active recall with immediate feedback — the two work best together.
Who writes these exercises?
Every exercise is written by the CoderSlingo team, drawing on real workplace English used in IT roles, then reviewed for accuracy and clarity.