Practise the standard verbs for presenting a design to an architecture review board.
0 / 5 completed
1 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ a proposal to the architecture review board well before implementation starts, so a fundamental objection surfaces while the design is still just a document.'
We 'submit a proposal' — the standard, simple collocation for formally presenting a design for review. The other options are less idiomatic here.
2 / 5
Fill in: 'Building a system first and only informing the board afterward can ___ a serious structural concern raised only once months of implementation work already exist.'
We say a late review will 'leave' a concern raised too late to act on cheaply — the standard, natural collocation for the resulting cost. The other options aren't idiomatic here.
3 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ the proposal in person where possible, since a live conversation surfaces the follow-up question a written document alone tends to leave unasked.'
We 'present a proposal' — the standard, simple collocation for walking a review board through a design directly. The other options are less idiomatic here.
4 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ every underlying assumption the board questions honestly, rather than defending the original design purely because it's already been drafted.'
We 'challenge an assumption' — the standard, simple collocation for scrutinising the reasoning behind a design choice. The other options are less idiomatic here.
5 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ the final design formally before implementation begins, so the team has explicit, recorded backing rather than an ambiguous verbal nod from the meeting.'
We 'approve a design' — the standard, simple collocation for formally sanctioning a proposal to proceed. The other options aren't idiomatic here.