Practise the standard verbs for running a genuinely useful 360 review.
0 / 5 completed
1 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ feedback from several peers, not just a manager, since one person's view of someone's day-to-day work is genuinely a narrow slice of it.'
We 'gather feedback' — the standard, simple collocation for collecting input from multiple colleagues. The other options are less idiomatic here.
2 / 5
Fill in: 'Relying on manager feedback alone instead of a full 360 can ___ a real pattern a peer would have flagged immediately going completely unmentioned.'
We say a single-source review will 'leave' a real pattern unmentioned — the standard, natural collocation for the resulting gap. The other options aren't idiomatic here.
3 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ every piece of peer feedback with a specific example, since 'good communicator' means far less than the actual moment that prompted the comment.'
We 'anchor feedback' — the standard, simple collocation for tying a comment to a concrete instance. The other options are less idiomatic here.
4 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ the collected feedback anonymously back to the person it's about, since attributed criticism from a peer tends to get softened into near-uselessness.'
We 'share feedback' — the standard, simple collocation for passing collected input to the subject of a review. The other options are less idiomatic here.
5 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ recurring themes across multiple peers' comments, rather than treating a single outlier remark as if it defined the whole picture.'
We 'weigh a theme' — the standard, simple collocation for judging the importance of a recurring pattern in feedback. The other options aren't idiomatic here.