Every engineering team reviews specs. Learn the precise collocations for approving documents, requesting changes, raising concerns, and closing open questions in professional technical reviews.
0 / 5 completed
1 / 5
The senior engineer decided to ___ changes to the spec before signing off on the implementation plan.
Request changes is the standard collocation in document review workflows — reviewers formally 'request changes' as a gating action. 'Suggest' and 'propose' are advisory; 'recommend' is softer. 'Request changes' implies the spec cannot move forward without revision.
2 / 5
After three rounds of review, the committee finally agreed to ___ the technical specification.
Approve the specification is the correct formal collocation in engineering review processes. 'Validate' is technical (confirms correctness); 'confirm' is conversational; 'accept' implies passive receipt. 'Approve' signals formal authorization to proceed.
3 / 5
During the review session, the architect ___ several concerns about the proposed data schema.
Raised concerns is the idiomatic collocation in professional review settings. 'Voiced concerns' is also natural but more formal/rhetorical; 'mentioned' is too casual; 'stated concerns' sounds bureaucratic. 'Raised' is the most common collocation in technical meetings.
4 / 5
The QA team was asked to ___ the spec against the existing API contracts to find discrepancies.
Cross-reference the spec is the precise technical collocation for checking one document against another. 'Compare' is generic; 'check' is vague; 'match' implies exact equality. 'Cross-reference' conveys a systematic, structured verification process.
5 / 5
Before implementation begins, we need to ___ all open questions in the specification.
Resolve open questions is the standard collocation in spec review language. 'Fix' implies bugs; 'solve' is for problems/puzzles; 'clear' is informal. 'Resolve' is the professional term for bringing open issues to a definitive conclusion.