WebAssembly Module Instantiation Language Collocations
Practise the standard verbs for instantiating and running WebAssembly modules efficiently.
0 / 5 completed
1 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ a WebAssembly module once and reuse the compiled instance across requests, rather than paying the compilation cost again on every single invocation.'
We 'instantiate a module' — the standard, established WebAssembly collocation for creating a runnable instance from compiled bytecode. The other options aren't the recognised term here.
2 / 5
Fill in: 'Recompiling the same WebAssembly module on every request instead of caching the instance can ___ latency dominated by compilation overhead rather than the actual work being done.'
We say repeated compilation will 'leave' latency dominated by overhead — the standard, natural collocation for the resulting cost. The other options aren't idiomatic here.
3 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ the imported functions a WebAssembly module expects explicitly at instantiation time, so a missing host binding fails fast instead of surfacing as an obscure runtime trap.'
We 'define imports' — the standard, simple collocation for specifying the host functions a module can call. The other options are less idiomatic here.
4 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ a linear memory limit on every module we run, so a runaway or malicious module can't simply keep growing memory until it exhausts the host process.'
We 'set a limit' — the standard, simple collocation for bounding a resource a module can consume. The other options are less idiomatic here.
5 / 5
Fill in: 'We ___ instantiation time against the module's binary size before shipping it to an edge runtime, since a large module can add real cold-start latency at the edge.'
We 'benchmark' instantiation time — the standard, established collocation for measuring a startup-cost metric. The other options aren't the recognised term here.