Practice English vocabulary for Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering compliance: identity verification, due diligence, suspicious activity, and transaction monitoring.
0 / 22 completed
1 / 22
What does 'KYC (Know Your Customer)' require financial institutions to do?
KYC is a regulatory requirement for banks and fintech companies to verify client identity (via ID documents, proof of address), assess risk, and monitor ongoing activity to prevent money laundering and fraud.
2 / 22
What is 'Customer Due Diligence (CDD)' in a KYC context?
CDD involves collecting information like name, address, occupation, and source of funds. Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) applies to higher-risk customers (e.g., Politically Exposed Persons) and requires deeper investigation.
3 / 22
What is a 'Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)'?
Financial institutions are legally required to file SARs when they identify potentially suspicious transactions. The report goes to authorities like FinCEN (US) or NCA (UK) without notifying the customer — known as 'tipping off' which is itself illegal.
4 / 22
What is 'transaction monitoring' in an AML context?
AML transaction monitoring systems apply rules and machine learning to flag suspicious patterns. Common red flags include 'structuring' (breaking large sums into smaller deposits to evade reporting thresholds) or layering (moving money through multiple accounts).
5 / 22
What does 'sanctions screening' mean in fintech payments?
Before processing payments, financial institutions screen all parties against sanctions lists (OFAC, EU, UN). Payments involving sanctioned parties must be blocked and reported. Sanctions violations carry severe regulatory penalties.
6 / 22
During a code review of a new payment API integration, Sarah notices that the developer, Mark, has implemented basic KYC checks - just confirming customer names and addresses. The lead reviewer, David, points out that this is insufficient. Which statement best explains David's concern?
While confirming customer names and addresses is a foundational step in KYC (Know Your Customer), it's insufficient for comprehensive AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance. Robust KYC requires ongoing due diligence, including risk assessment, transaction monitoring, and sanctions screening – aspects Mark's code completely lacks. Failing to do so leaves the system vulnerable to misuse.
7 / 22
During a code review of a new microservice for processing international money transfers, Liam is examining the implementation of PEP (Politically Exposed Person) screening. He discovers that the developer, Emily, has simply checked against a publicly available list of names and addresses. The compliance officer, Fiona, raises concerns. Which statement best reflects Fiona's viewpoint?
Liam: "I thought we were just checking against a standard database – it's better than nothing!"
Emily: "It covers the most obvious cases."
The key issue with relying solely on publicly available lists for PEP screening is that PEPs frequently utilize complex structures – shell companies, trusts, and intermediaries – to conceal their identities. A simple name match won't detect these connections. The correct answer highlights this limitation, emphasizing the need for more sophisticated analysis beyond basic database lookups. Options A & B misinterpret the nature of regulatory lists and the level of investigation required, while option D is factually incorrect given the sensitive nature of PEP screening.
8 / 22
During a code review of a new SaaS platform integration for processing subscription payments, Noah is reviewing the implementation of enhanced due diligence (EDD) checks. The developer, Olivia, has implemented basic checks – verifying customer names and addresses against a public database. However, the client, 'NovaTech', is a high-value subscriber with a complex international payment structure. The Head of Risk, Samuel, flags this as insufficient. Which statement best explains Samuel's concern?
Samuel's concern highlights that basic KYC checks are often inadequate for high-value or complex clients. EDD requires a deeper investigation beyond just name and address verification, including examining beneficial ownership, transaction patterns, and potential connections to sanctioned entities to mitigate the increased risk posed by NovaTech's unique profile.
9 / 22
During a code review of a new payment API integration, Sarah notices that the developer, Mark, has implemented basic KYC checks - just confirming customer names and addresses. The lead reviewer, David, points out that this is insufficient. Which statement best explains David's concern?
While confirming customer names and addresses is a foundational step in KYC (Know Your Customer), it's insufficient for comprehensive AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance. Robust KYC requires ongoing due diligence, including risk assessment, transaction monitoring, and sanctions screening – aspects Mark's code completely lacks. Failing to do so leaves the system vulnerable to misuse.
10 / 22
During a code review of a new microservice for processing international money transfers, Liam is examining the implementation of PEP (Politically Exposed Person) screening. He discovers that the developer, Emily, has simply checked against a publicly available list of names and addresses. The compliance officer, Fiona, raises concerns. Which statement best reflects Fiona's viewpoint?
Liam: "I thought we were just checking against a standard database – it's better than nothing!"
Emily: "It covers the most obvious cases."
The key issue with relying solely on publicly available lists for PEP screening is that PEPs frequently utilize complex structures – shell companies, trusts, and intermediaries – to conceal their identities. A simple name match won't detect these connections. The correct answer highlights this limitation, emphasizing the need for more sophisticated analysis beyond basic database lookups. Options A & B misinterpret the nature of regulatory lists and the level of investigation required, while option D is factually incorrect given the sensitive nature of PEP screening.
11 / 22
During a code review of a new SaaS platform integration for processing subscription payments, Noah is reviewing the implementation of enhanced due diligence (EDD) checks. The developer, Olivia, has implemented basic checks – verifying customer names and addresses against a public database. However, the client, 'NovaTech', is a high-value subscriber with a complex international payment structure. The Head of Risk, Samuel, flags this as insufficient. Which statement best explains Samuel's concern?
Samuel's concern highlights that basic KYC checks are often inadequate for high-value or complex clients. EDD requires a deeper investigation beyond just name and address verification, including examining beneficial ownership, transaction patterns, and potential connections to sanctioned entities to mitigate the increased risk posed by NovaTech's unique profile.
12 / 22
During a code review of a new payment API integration, Sarah notices that the developer, Mark, has implemented basic KYC checks - just confirming customer names and addresses. The lead reviewer, David, points out that this is insufficient. Which statement best explains David's concern?
While confirming customer names and addresses is a foundational step in KYC (Know Your Customer), it's insufficient for comprehensive AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance. Robust KYC requires ongoing due diligence, including risk assessment, transaction monitoring, and sanctions screening – aspects Mark's code completely lacks. Failing to do so leaves the system vulnerable to misuse.
13 / 22
During a code review of a new microservice for processing international money transfers, Liam is examining the implementation of PEP (Politically Exposed Person) screening. He discovers that the developer, Emily, has simply checked against a publicly available list of names and addresses. The compliance officer, Fiona, raises concerns. Which statement best reflects Fiona's viewpoint?
Liam: "I thought we were just checking against a standard database – it's better than nothing!"
Emily: "It covers the most obvious cases."
The key issue with relying solely on publicly available lists for PEP screening is that PEPs frequently utilize complex structures – shell companies, trusts, and intermediaries – to conceal their identities. A simple name match won't detect these connections. The correct answer highlights this limitation, emphasizing the need for more sophisticated analysis beyond basic database lookups. Options A & B misinterpret the nature of regulatory lists and the level of investigation required, while option D is factually incorrect given the sensitive nature of PEP screening.
14 / 22
During a code review of a new SaaS platform integration for processing subscription payments, Noah is reviewing the implementation of enhanced due diligence (EDD) checks. The developer, Olivia, has implemented basic checks – verifying customer names and addresses against a public database. However, the client, 'NovaTech', is a high-value subscriber with a complex international payment structure. The Head of Risk, Samuel, flags this as insufficient. Which statement best explains Samuel's concern?
Samuel's concern highlights that basic KYC checks are often inadequate for high-value or complex clients. EDD requires a deeper investigation beyond just name and address verification, including examining beneficial ownership, transaction patterns, and potential connections to sanctioned entities to mitigate the increased risk posed by NovaTech's unique profile.
15 / 22
During a code review of a new payment API integration, Sarah notices that the developer, Mark, has implemented basic KYC checks - just confirming customer names and addresses. The lead reviewer, David, points out that this is insufficient. Which statement best explains David's concern?
While confirming customer names and addresses is a foundational step in KYC (Know Your Customer), it's insufficient for comprehensive AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance. Robust KYC requires ongoing due diligence, including risk assessment, transaction monitoring, and sanctions screening – aspects Mark's code completely lacks. Failing to do so leaves the system vulnerable to misuse.
16 / 22
During a code review of a new microservice for processing international money transfers, Liam is examining the implementation of PEP (Politically Exposed Person) screening. He discovers that the developer, Emily, has simply checked against a publicly available list of names and addresses. The compliance officer, Fiona, raises concerns. Which statement best reflects Fiona's viewpoint?
Liam: "I thought we were just checking against a standard database – it's better than nothing!"
Emily: "It covers the most obvious cases."
The key issue with relying solely on publicly available lists for PEP screening is that PEPs frequently utilize complex structures – shell companies, trusts, and intermediaries – to conceal their identities. A simple name match won't detect these connections. The correct answer highlights this limitation, emphasizing the need for more sophisticated analysis beyond basic database lookups. Options A & B misinterpret the nature of regulatory lists and the level of investigation required, while option D is factually incorrect given the sensitive nature of PEP screening.
17 / 22
During a code review of a new SaaS platform integration for processing subscription payments, Noah is reviewing the implementation of enhanced due diligence (EDD) checks. The developer, Olivia, has implemented basic checks – verifying customer names and addresses against a public database. However, the client, 'NovaTech', is a high-value subscriber with a complex international payment structure. The Head of Risk, Samuel, flags this as insufficient. Which statement best explains Samuel's concern?
Samuel's concern highlights that basic KYC checks are often inadequate for high-value or complex clients. EDD requires a deeper investigation beyond just name and address verification, including examining beneficial ownership, transaction patterns, and potential connections to sanctioned entities to mitigate the increased risk posed by NovaTech's unique profile.
18 / 22
During a Slack discussion about the new transaction monitoring system, Alex asks: 'We need to flag anything unusual, right? Just high volume transactions are enough?' Ben replies:
Which of the following best describes Ben's response in the context of AML compliance?
Transaction monitoring isn't simply about detecting high volumes. It involves analyzing patterns of behavior – velocity, unusual destinations, deviations from a user's typical profile – to identify potentially illicit activities. Ben is correct; a more sophisticated approach is required to avoid false positives and ensure effective AML detection.
19 / 22
As a Lead Developer, you're reviewing a PR describing the implementation of PEP screening. The description states: 'This module performs basic checks against globally available sanctions lists.' Which statement best explains why this is insufficient?
PEP screening goes beyond simple sanctions lists. It requires identifying individuals who hold prominent public positions and may be involved in corrupt activities – these are often not found on standard sanctions lists. Therefore, a basic check against globally available lists is insufficient for robust AML due diligence.
20 / 22
You're receiving an API response from a KYC provider indicating 'Customer Data Incomplete – Address Required'. What does this message primarily signify?
'Customer Data Incomplete – Address Required' isn't about customer refusal or technical errors. It highlights that the provider doesn't have all the necessary data to fulfill its KYC obligations—the system is flagging a gap in the required information which needs investigation and likely triggers further checks.
21 / 22
During a standup meeting, Priya says: 'I've implemented a basic customer onboarding flow – just verifying names and addresses. It's enough to get them started.' The team lead responds:
What is the primary concern with Priya's statement in relation to AML compliance?
KYC and AML compliance requires a layered approach, not just basic identity verification. Simply confirming names and addresses doesn't constitute sufficient risk assessment or due diligence – it leaves the business exposed to significant regulatory penalties and illicit activity.
22 / 22
You're reviewing a PR describing the implementation of enhanced due diligence (EDD) checks for high-risk customers. The developer includes a comment: 'This ensures we comply with regulations regarding politically exposed persons.' What is the most accurate interpretation of this statement?
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) specifically targets 'Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs)' – individuals who hold prominent public functions. The goal isn't just identification but also heightened scrutiny and increased monitoring to address the elevated risks associated with these roles.
What does the "KYC and AML Vocabulary" exercise cover?
Practice English vocabulary for Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering compliance: identity verification, due diligence, suspicious activity, and transaction monitoring.
Is this exercise free to use?
Yes. Every exercise on CoderSlingo, including this one, is free to use with no account, sign-up, or paywall.
How many questions are in "KYC and AML Vocabulary"?
This exercise has 22 questions. Each one gives instant feedback with an explanation, so you can see exactly why an answer is right or wrong.
Do I need to create an account to save my progress?
No account is required. The progress bar and score are tracked in your browser for the current session -- the exercise is designed to be a quick, repeatable drill rather than something you resume later.
What happens if I get an answer wrong?
You'll see the correct answer highlighted immediately, along with a short explanation of why it's correct. Wrong answers aren't penalized beyond your score, and you can keep going through every question.
How is this exercise different from reading an article?
Articles explain vocabulary and concepts through prose, while exercises like this one are interactive drills -- multiple-choice questions -- that test and reinforce your recall of specific terms and phrasing.
Can I retry this exercise?
Yes -- use the "Try again" button on the results screen to reset your score and go through all the questions again from the start.
Where can I find more Fintech Protocol Language exercises?
Browse the full Fintech Protocol Language hub for related drills, or check the site-wide exercises index for other IT English topics.
Is this exercise suitable for beginners?
This exercise assumes basic familiarity with IT terminology. If a term feels unfamiliar, check the site Glossary for a plain-English definition before attempting the questions.
How often is new content like this published?
New exercises are added regularly across all categories, alongside new vocabulary sets and articles. Check back on the exercises hub to see what's new.