Intermediate
Grammar
#discourse-markers
#postmortems
#retrospectives
"As Things Turned Out" as a Retrospective Marker
10 exercises — how "as things turned out" contrasts a past expectation with the actual, now-known resolution in postmortems and retrospectives, and how it differs from "as expected" and "as things stand."
Quick reference
- As things turned out: reveals how a past situation actually resolved, often contrasting with an earlier expectation
- Always past tense ("turned out"), referring to a completed, now-known outcome
- Fixed word order: "as" + "things" + "turned out" — never rearranged
- Contrast: "as expected" confirms the prediction was correct; "as things stand" describes the present, not a past resolution
- Register: neutral, common in both spoken retrospectives and written postmortems
0 / 30 completed
1 / 30
A postmortem states:
"We expected the migration to take a full weekend. ___ , it finished in under four hours."
Which phrase best introduces the actual, retrospectively-known outcome, contrasted with an earlier expectation?
"We expected the migration to take a full weekend. ___ , it finished in under four hours."
Which phrase best introduces the actual, retrospectively-known outcome, contrasted with an earlier expectation?
As things turned out is the fixed retrospective marker for revealing how a situation actually resolved, typically contrasted with an earlier plan, prediction, or fear. "As things stand" describes the current, present-tense state of affairs, not a past outcome. "As it happens" introduces a coincidental fact relevant right now, not a completed narrative resolution. "As is the case" means "as is true" and needs a following "with," a different structure entirely.
2 / 30
Which sentence uses "as things turned out" correctly?
"We were worried the rollback would cause data loss. As things turned out, the backup restored cleanly with no issues" is correct — a past worry is followed by the actual, better-than-feared resolution. It cannot introduce a command ("please monitor"), and it is always in the past tense ("turned out"), never present ("turn out") when referring to a future event still to be resolved — that meaning needs a genuine future construction instead.
3 / 30
Fill the blank:
"We thought the vendor's API would be a bottleneck. ___ , our own database queries were the real problem."
"We thought the vendor's API would be a bottleneck. ___ , our own database queries were the real problem."
As things turned out has a fixed word order: "as" + "things" + "turned out." The other three options scramble this into invalid, meaningless sequences; fixed retrospective markers of this kind do not permit reordering.
4 / 30
Which pair correctly distinguishes "as things turned out" from "as expected"?
These phrases both look back at an outcome, but with opposite implications about surprise. "As things turned out" most often (though not exclusively) signals that reality diverged from the expectation, whether for better or worse: "We feared the worst; as things turned out, it was a minor issue." "As expected" instead confirms the outcome matched the prediction exactly: "As expected, the load test revealed the bottleneck in the database layer." Swapping one for the other can misrepresent whether the result was a surprise.
5 / 30
A retrospective note reads: "We were confident the new caching layer would fix the latency problem. ___ , it introduced a subtle race condition instead."
Which best completes the sentence?
Which best completes the sentence?
As things turned out is the correct, plural form ("things," not "thing"). Option D drops the required plural, a common error. Options B and C scramble the fixed word order into invalid phrases.
6 / 30
Which sentence contains an error in the use of "as things turned out"?
"The team expected a smooth rollout; as things turned out that they discussed, three customers reported errors" incorrectly attaches a relative clause ("that they discussed") directly onto the fixed phrase, treating it as a modifiable noun phrase. "As things turned out" functions as a stand-alone adverbial introducing an independent clause; it does not take trailing relative-clause modification. The other three sentences use it correctly.
7 / 30
Choose the sentence where "as things turned out" is best replaced by "in the end, contrary to expectations" without changing the meaning.
"We were sure the bug was in the frontend. In the end, contrary to expectations, the root cause was a misconfigured backend timeout" preserves the meaning: a firm assumption overturned by the actual outcome. The other options misuse the phrase as a command softener, confuse it with a literal (and unrelated) verb phrase about turning things out as expected, or incorrectly use the present tense "turn out" for an outcome that has not yet been resolved.
8 / 30
A design review comment states: "We chose the simplest possible schema, expecting we'd need to redesign it within a year. ___ , it has scaled fine for three years without changes."
Which best fits?
Which best fits?
As things turned out is the correct, standard form. Option B incorrectly adds an apostrophe, misspelling the plural "things" as a possessive. Option C uses the wrong verb form ("had turn out" is not valid — it should be either "turned out" or "had turned out," but "had turn out" mixes an auxiliary with the base form incorrectly). Option D incorrectly uses the gerund "turning" in place of the fixed past-tense form.
9 / 30
Which register note about "as things turned out" is accurate?
"As things turned out" is a neutral, widely used phrase at home in both spoken retrospectives ("As things turned out, we didn't even need the extra capacity") and written postmortems. It can describe outcomes better, worse, or simply different from what was expected — the only requirement is that the outcome is now known and settled, which is why the phrase is always past tense ("turned out"), never present, when referring to a resolved situation.
10 / 30
Which sentence best demonstrates "as things turned out" contrasting a past fear with an actual, better resolution?
"We were bracing for a multi-day outage after the primary database failed. As things turned out, the standby replica took over within minutes and most users never noticed" is the textbook use: a serious feared outcome contrasted with a much better actual resolution. The other options misuse the phrase as a forward-looking instruction, insert it awkwardly mid-clause ("as things turned out being reliable"), or incorrectly use the present tense for an outcome that has not yet occurred.
11 / 30
During a post-deployment review for the new payment gateway integration, Sarah commented in the Slack channel: 'Initially, I was worried the rate limiting would cause significant delays. As things turned out, we were able to optimize the request queuing and it's handling transactions perfectly.' Which phrase best captures the nuance of Sarah's statement regarding the anticipated issue and its actual resolution?
Sarah's statement uses 'as things turned out' to highlight a contrast between her *expectation* of problems (rate limiting causing delays) and the *reality* – successful optimization leading to perfect transaction handling. The phrase emphasizes that the initial worry was misplaced, showcasing a positive outcome despite the prior apprehension. Option A is too negative; option C suggests a continued problem; option D indicates a serious failure.
12 / 30
PR Description: 'We anticipated a significant performance hit after deploying the new image resizing service. Initial metrics showed a 30% increase in processing time. However, after further investigation and tweaking the caching strategy, we've observed a 15% *improvement*.' Which phrase best captures the shift in perspective described in this PR?This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' in a context where initial predictions were incorrect. The key is recognizing that the PR describes a *contrast* between an anticipated negative outcome (30% increase) and the actual positive result (15% improvement). Option A is too generic, option B doesn't accurately reflect the timeline or the degree of change, and option D restates the problem rather than highlighting the resolution. Option C most precisely conveys this shift in perspective.
13 / 30
Product Manager (Slack): 'Okay team, just a quick update on the user onboarding flow. Initially, we were seeing a high drop-off rate during the initial setup wizard. As things turned out, users were simply getting confused by the terminology – specifically, the term 'API Key'.
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out'. The key is that the original expectation (high drop-off) was not the *cause* of the subsequent improvement. The team's actions addressed a specific issue – confusing terminology – which directly led to the positive outcome. Option A misinterprets the situation, suggesting the initial confusion was the problem itself; options B and D are too absolute and don't reflect the nuanced reality.
14 / 30
During a sprint retrospective, the team discussed the recent implementation of a new user authentication service. Initially, concerns were raised about potential security vulnerabilities due to the OAuth 2.0 flow. However, after thorough penetration testing and code reviews, no vulnerabilities were found. Mark commented: 'I was pretty sure we'd be spending weeks patching holes in that system. As things turned out, it's remarkably secure.' Which phrase best captures the tone of Mark's comment regarding his initial apprehension and the actual outcome?
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' used to describe a contrast between an anticipated negative outcome and a surprisingly positive one. The key is that Mark didn't just state his initial worry; he highlighted the *expectation* of problems, making the shift in perspective clear. Option A incorrectly focuses on a lack of logging (a separate issue). Option B misinterprets the phrase as simply confirming the risk, while option D is too general and doesn't capture the nuance.
15 / 30
During a code review of a new microservice designed to handle user profile updates, David pointed out a potential race condition. He said: 'I was worried that concurrent updates to the same profile would lead to data corruption. As things turned out,' he continued, 'the optimistic locking strategy is working perfectly and preventing any conflicts.' Which phrase best captures the *tone* of David's statement regarding his initial concern and the actual outcome?
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' as expressing a contrast between an anticipated negative outcome and a positive reality. The correct option (''As things turned out, it's working perfectly.'') captures the key element – David's surprise at the successful operation of his solution. Options A and C are too detailed, while Option B focuses solely on the technical fix without acknowledging the initial fear.
16 / 30
During a post-deployment review for the new payment gateway integration, Sarah commented in the Slack channel: 'Initially, I was worried the rate limiting would cause significant delays. As things turned out, we were able to optimize the request queuing and it's handling transactions perfectly.' Which phrase best captures the nuance of Sarah's statement regarding the anticipated issue and its actual resolution?
Sarah's statement uses 'as things turned out' to highlight a contrast between her *expectation* of problems (rate limiting causing delays) and the *reality* – successful optimization leading to perfect transaction handling. The phrase emphasizes that the initial worry was misplaced, showcasing a positive outcome despite the prior apprehension. Option A is too negative; option C suggests a continued problem; option D indicates a serious failure.
17 / 30
PR Description: 'We anticipated a significant performance hit after deploying the new image resizing service. Initial metrics showed a 30% increase in processing time. However, after further investigation and tweaking the caching strategy, we've observed a 15% *improvement*.' Which phrase best captures the shift in perspective described in this PR?This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' in a context where initial predictions were incorrect. The key is recognizing that the PR describes a *contrast* between an anticipated negative outcome (30% increase) and the actual positive result (15% improvement). Option A is too generic, option B doesn't accurately reflect the timeline or the degree of change, and option D restates the problem rather than highlighting the resolution. Option C most precisely conveys this shift in perspective.
18 / 30
Product Manager (Slack): 'Okay team, just a quick update on the user onboarding flow. Initially, we were seeing a high drop-off rate during the initial setup wizard. As things turned out, users were simply getting confused by the terminology – specifically, the term 'API Key'.
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out'. The key is that the original expectation (high drop-off) was not the *cause* of the subsequent improvement. The team's actions addressed a specific issue – confusing terminology – which directly led to the positive outcome. Option A misinterprets the situation, suggesting the initial confusion was the problem itself; options B and D are too absolute and don't reflect the nuanced reality.
19 / 30
During a sprint retrospective, the team discussed the recent implementation of a new user authentication service. Initially, concerns were raised about potential security vulnerabilities due to the OAuth 2.0 flow. However, after thorough penetration testing and code reviews, no vulnerabilities were found. Mark commented: 'I was pretty sure we'd be spending weeks patching holes in that system. As things turned out, it's remarkably secure.' Which phrase best captures the tone of Mark's comment regarding his initial apprehension and the actual outcome?
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' used to describe a contrast between an anticipated negative outcome and a surprisingly positive one. The key is that Mark didn't just state his initial worry; he highlighted the *expectation* of problems, making the shift in perspective clear. Option A incorrectly focuses on a lack of logging (a separate issue). Option B misinterprets the phrase as simply confirming the risk, while option D is too general and doesn't capture the nuance.
20 / 30
During a code review of a new microservice designed to handle user profile updates, David pointed out a potential race condition. He said: 'I was worried that concurrent updates to the same profile would lead to data corruption. As things turned out,' he continued, 'the optimistic locking strategy is working perfectly and preventing any conflicts.' Which phrase best captures the *tone* of David's statement regarding his initial concern and the actual outcome?
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' as expressing a contrast between an anticipated negative outcome and a positive reality. The correct option (''As things turned out, it's working perfectly.'') captures the key element – David's surprise at the successful operation of his solution. Options A and C are too detailed, while Option B focuses solely on the technical fix without acknowledging the initial fear.
21 / 30
During a post-deployment review for the new payment gateway integration, Sarah commented in the Slack channel: 'Initially, I was worried the rate limiting would cause significant delays. As things turned out, we were able to optimize the request queuing and it's handling transactions perfectly.' Which phrase best captures the nuance of Sarah's statement regarding the anticipated issue and its actual resolution?
Sarah's statement uses 'as things turned out' to highlight a contrast between her *expectation* of problems (rate limiting causing delays) and the *reality* – successful optimization leading to perfect transaction handling. The phrase emphasizes that the initial worry was misplaced, showcasing a positive outcome despite the prior apprehension. Option A is too negative; option C suggests a continued problem; option D indicates a serious failure.
22 / 30
PR Description: 'We anticipated a significant performance hit after deploying the new image resizing service. Initial metrics showed a 30% increase in processing time. However, after further investigation and tweaking the caching strategy, we've observed a 15% *improvement*.' Which phrase best captures the shift in perspective described in this PR?This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' in a context where initial predictions were incorrect. The key is recognizing that the PR describes a *contrast* between an anticipated negative outcome (30% increase) and the actual positive result (15% improvement). Option A is too generic, option B doesn't accurately reflect the timeline or the degree of change, and option D restates the problem rather than highlighting the resolution. Option C most precisely conveys this shift in perspective.
23 / 30
Product Manager (Slack): 'Okay team, just a quick update on the user onboarding flow. Initially, we were seeing a high drop-off rate during the initial setup wizard. As things turned out, users were simply getting confused by the terminology – specifically, the term 'API Key'.
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out'. The key is that the original expectation (high drop-off) was not the *cause* of the subsequent improvement. The team's actions addressed a specific issue – confusing terminology – which directly led to the positive outcome. Option A misinterprets the situation, suggesting the initial confusion was the problem itself; options B and D are too absolute and don't reflect the nuanced reality.
24 / 30
During a sprint retrospective, the team discussed the recent implementation of a new user authentication service. Initially, concerns were raised about potential security vulnerabilities due to the OAuth 2.0 flow. However, after thorough penetration testing and code reviews, no vulnerabilities were found. Mark commented: 'I was pretty sure we'd be spending weeks patching holes in that system. As things turned out, it's remarkably secure.' Which phrase best captures the tone of Mark's comment regarding his initial apprehension and the actual outcome?
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' used to describe a contrast between an anticipated negative outcome and a surprisingly positive one. The key is that Mark didn't just state his initial worry; he highlighted the *expectation* of problems, making the shift in perspective clear. Option A incorrectly focuses on a lack of logging (a separate issue). Option B misinterprets the phrase as simply confirming the risk, while option D is too general and doesn't capture the nuance.
25 / 30
During a code review of a new microservice designed to handle user profile updates, David pointed out a potential race condition. He said: 'I was worried that concurrent updates to the same profile would lead to data corruption. As things turned out,' he continued, 'the optimistic locking strategy is working perfectly and preventing any conflicts.' Which phrase best captures the *tone* of David's statement regarding his initial concern and the actual outcome?
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' as expressing a contrast between an anticipated negative outcome and a positive reality. The correct option (''As things turned out, it's working perfectly.'') captures the key element – David's surprise at the successful operation of his solution. Options A and C are too detailed, while Option B focuses solely on the technical fix without acknowledging the initial fear.
26 / 30
During a post-deployment review for the new payment gateway integration, Sarah commented in the Slack channel: 'Initially, I was worried the rate limiting would cause significant delays. As things turned out, we were able to optimize the request queuing and it's handling transactions perfectly.' Which phrase best captures the nuance of Sarah's statement regarding the anticipated issue and its actual resolution?
Sarah's statement uses 'as things turned out' to highlight a contrast between her *expectation* of problems (rate limiting causing delays) and the *reality* – successful optimization leading to perfect transaction handling. The phrase emphasizes that the initial worry was misplaced, showcasing a positive outcome despite the prior apprehension. Option A is too negative; option C suggests a continued problem; option D indicates a serious failure.
27 / 30
PR Description: 'We anticipated a significant performance hit after deploying the new image resizing service. Initial metrics showed a 30% increase in processing time. However, after further investigation and tweaking the caching strategy, we've observed a 15% *improvement*.' Which phrase best captures the shift in perspective described in this PR?This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' in a context where initial predictions were incorrect. The key is recognizing that the PR describes a *contrast* between an anticipated negative outcome (30% increase) and the actual positive result (15% improvement). Option A is too generic, option B doesn't accurately reflect the timeline or the degree of change, and option D restates the problem rather than highlighting the resolution. Option C most precisely conveys this shift in perspective.
28 / 30
Product Manager (Slack): 'Okay team, just a quick update on the user onboarding flow. Initially, we were seeing a high drop-off rate during the initial setup wizard. As things turned out, users were simply getting confused by the terminology – specifically, the term 'API Key'.
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out'. The key is that the original expectation (high drop-off) was not the *cause* of the subsequent improvement. The team's actions addressed a specific issue – confusing terminology – which directly led to the positive outcome. Option A misinterprets the situation, suggesting the initial confusion was the problem itself; options B and D are too absolute and don't reflect the nuanced reality.
29 / 30
During a sprint retrospective, the team discussed the recent implementation of a new user authentication service. Initially, concerns were raised about potential security vulnerabilities due to the OAuth 2.0 flow. However, after thorough penetration testing and code reviews, no vulnerabilities were found. Mark commented: 'I was pretty sure we'd be spending weeks patching holes in that system. As things turned out, it's remarkably secure.' Which phrase best captures the tone of Mark's comment regarding his initial apprehension and the actual outcome?
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' used to describe a contrast between an anticipated negative outcome and a surprisingly positive one. The key is that Mark didn't just state his initial worry; he highlighted the *expectation* of problems, making the shift in perspective clear. Option A incorrectly focuses on a lack of logging (a separate issue). Option B misinterprets the phrase as simply confirming the risk, while option D is too general and doesn't capture the nuance.
30 / 30
During a code review of a new microservice designed to handle user profile updates, David pointed out a potential race condition. He said: 'I was worried that concurrent updates to the same profile would lead to data corruption. As things turned out,' he continued, 'the optimistic locking strategy is working perfectly and preventing any conflicts.' Which phrase best captures the *tone* of David's statement regarding his initial concern and the actual outcome?
This question tests understanding of 'as things turned out' as expressing a contrast between an anticipated negative outcome and a positive reality. The correct option (''As things turned out, it's working perfectly.'') captures the key element – David's surprise at the successful operation of his solution. Options A and C are too detailed, while Option B focuses solely on the technical fix without acknowledging the initial fear.
Frequently Asked Questions
What will I practise in ""As Things Turned Out" as a Retrospective Marker — IT English Grammar"?
Practice using "as things turned out" to reveal how a past situation actually resolved, often contrasting with an earlier fear, plan, or prediction, in
How many exercises are in this module?
This module has 30 multiple-choice exercises, each with instant feedback and a full explanation of the correct answer.
Is this exercise free to use?
Yes. Every exercise on CoderSlingo, including this one, is free to use with no account, sign-up, or paywall.
Do I need to create an account to do these exercises?
No account is required. Just click an option to answer — your score for this session is tracked automatically in the progress bar above.
What happens if I choose the wrong answer?
You'll immediately see which answer was correct, plus a full explanation covering the grammar rule and reasoning behind it — mistakes are where most of the learning happens.
Can I retry the exercises if I want a higher score?
Yes — use the "Try again" button on the results screen to reset and go through all the questions again.
Is my progress saved if I close the page?
No. Progress is tracked only for your current visit; reloading or leaving the page resets the counter. This keeps the exercise simple and account-free.
Where can I find more Grammar exercises?
Browse the full Grammar hub for related drills, or check the "Next up" link below to continue with a connected topic.
How is this different from reading an article on the same topic?
Articles explain grammar rules in prose; this exercise tests and reinforces those rules through active recall with immediate feedback — the two work best together.
Who writes these exercises?
Every exercise is written by the CoderSlingo team, drawing on real workplace English used in IT roles, then reviewed for accuracy and clarity.