5 exercises — using I think, I suspect, I gather, and I take it to signal calibrated confidence in code reviews, design docs, and incident write-ups.
0 / 18 completed
1 / 18
A senior engineer reviewing a PR writes: "___ this breaks the rate limiter under load, but I haven't tested it." Which epistemic parenthetical fits best?
I suspect is correct. Epistemic parentheticals like I think, I suspect, I gather, I take it signal the speaker's degree of confidence in a claim without a full subordinate clause ("I suspect that..."). "I suspect" is a mid-confidence hedge appropriate when you have a reasoned guess but no direct evidence — exactly the case here ("haven't tested it"). "I know" and "I confirm" claim certainty the speaker does not have, which is misleading in a code review. "I guarantee" is far too strong for an untested hypothesis. Calibration rule: match the parenthetical's confidence level to your actual evidence. Overclaiming certainty in reviews erodes trust when you turn out to be wrong.
2 / 18
Which sentence correctly uses "I take it" as an epistemic parenthetical?
"I take it that you have reviewed the design doc already" is correct — "I take it (that)" is a fixed epistemic phrase meaning "I assume, based on available evidence." It can appear sentence-initially with an optional "that", or attached at the end of a sentence as a genuine parenthetical: "You've reviewed the design doc already, I take it." Note the difference: mid-sentence or trailing use drops the connecting "that" entirely — it becomes a true parenthetical, set off by a comma, not fused awkwardly into the main clause. Option B breaks the clause structure ungrammatically. Option C misplaces "that" after the parenthetical has already been separated by a comma. Option D turns it into a needlessly complex hybrid of statement and question.
3 / 18
In a Slack thread about a production incident, an engineer writes: "The cache eviction policy is misconfigured, I gather, from the eviction rate graph." What does "I gather" signal here?
"I gather" signals inference from indirect evidence — the speaker is reasoning from data (the graph) to a conclusion, rather than reporting something they directly witnessed or were told outright. It sits between "I think" (weaker, more subjective) and "I can see" (stronger, more direct) on the certainty scale. Placement note: mid-sentence parentheticals like this are set off by commas on both sides — "is misconfigured, I gather, from the eviction rate graph" — and can be moved to the front ("I gather the cache eviction policy is misconfigured...") without changing meaning. This flexibility is a hallmark of true parenthetical structures, distinguishing them from clauses that are grammatically required in one fixed position.
4 / 18
A tech lead wants to soften a critical observation in a design review. Which revision uses an epistemic parenthetical most effectively?
Option B is the most effective use of an epistemic parenthetical. "I'd imagine" (a conditional, extra-hedged form of "I imagine") signals that the speaker is reasoning through a hypothetical scenario ("if two writers hit the same key concurrently") rather than asserting a confirmed bug — appropriate tone for a design review where the issue hasn't been reproduced. Option A is blunt and offers no reasoning. Option C claims certainty ("definitely") without evidence, which can come across as dismissive if wrong. Option D self-contradicts: pairing a hedge ("I imagine") with a certainty adverb ("definitely") sends a mixed signal about how confident the speaker actually is. Pattern: hedge once, consistently — don't hedge and assert certainty in the same breath.
5 / 18
Which pair correctly orders epistemic parentheticals from LEAST to MOST confident?
"I suspect" → "I gather" → "I'm fairly sure" correctly moves from weakest to strongest confidence. "I suspect" implies a hunch with little direct evidence. "I gather" implies a reasoned inference from some evidence (a report, a graph, a colleague's comment). "I'm fairly sure" implies strong but not total confidence. "I know" (used in option A and D) is not a hedge at all — it claims certainty and doesn't belong on a hedging scale with the others. Why this matters in technical writing: using a consistent, calibrated vocabulary of certainty (from "I suspect" up through "I'm confident" to "I know") lets colleagues correctly weight your claims — critical in incident reports and code reviews where overclaiming certainty can send someone down the wrong debugging path.
6 / 18
During a standup meeting, David says, "I suspect the database server is overloaded based on recent monitoring data." Which aspect of David's statement best demonstrates the use of an epistemic parenthetical?
David uses 'I suspect' to indicate that his statement is based on observation and a preliminary belief. It acknowledges the possibility of error or incomplete information, signaling a need for further investigation rather than stating a confirmed fact. Option A incorrectly portrays certainty; options C & D are inappropriate for standup reporting.
7 / 18
After reviewing the system logs, Sarah writes: "I take it that the API endpoint is experiencing high latency."
Sarah uses 'I take it' as an epistemic parenthetical. It expresses a tentative inference based on the logs. The phrase indicates she's drawing a conclusion from evidence but acknowledges that this conclusion might not be fully confirmed, prompting further investigation.
8 / 18
Rewrite the following sentence to use an epistemic parenthetical for a more diplomatic tone: 'The code is inefficient and requires significant optimization.'
Changing 'I believe' softens the criticism. It avoids direct judgment while still conveying that the speaker perceives an area for improvement. Options A & D are too blunt; option B is redundant.
9 / 18
During a standup meeting, David says, "I suspect the database server is overloaded based on recent monitoring data." Which aspect of David's statement best demonstrates the use of an epistemic parenthetical?
David uses 'I suspect' to indicate that his statement is based on observation and a preliminary belief. It acknowledges the possibility of error or incomplete information, signaling a need for further investigation rather than stating a confirmed fact. Option A incorrectly portrays certainty; options C & D are inappropriate for standup reporting.
10 / 18
After reviewing the system logs, Sarah writes: "I take it that the API endpoint is experiencing high latency."
Sarah uses 'I take it' as an epistemic parenthetical. It expresses a tentative inference based on the logs. The phrase indicates she's drawing a conclusion from evidence but acknowledges that this conclusion might not be fully confirmed, prompting further investigation.
11 / 18
Rewrite the following sentence to use an epistemic parenthetical for a more diplomatic tone: 'The code is inefficient and requires significant optimization.'
Changing 'I believe' softens the criticism. It avoids direct judgment while still conveying that the speaker perceives an area for improvement. Options A & D are too blunt; option B is redundant.
12 / 18
During a standup meeting, David says, "I suspect the database server is overloaded based on recent monitoring data." Which aspect of David's statement best demonstrates the use of an epistemic parenthetical?
David uses 'I suspect' to indicate that his statement is based on observation and a preliminary belief. It acknowledges the possibility of error or incomplete information, signaling a need for further investigation rather than stating a confirmed fact. Option A incorrectly portrays certainty; options C & D are inappropriate for standup reporting.
13 / 18
After reviewing the system logs, Sarah writes: "I take it that the API endpoint is experiencing high latency."
Sarah uses 'I take it' as an epistemic parenthetical. It expresses a tentative inference based on the logs. The phrase indicates she's drawing a conclusion from evidence but acknowledges that this conclusion might not be fully confirmed, prompting further investigation.
14 / 18
Rewrite the following sentence to use an epistemic parenthetical for a more diplomatic tone: 'The code is inefficient and requires significant optimization.'
Changing 'I believe' softens the criticism. It avoids direct judgment while still conveying that the speaker perceives an area for improvement. Options A & D are too blunt; option B is redundant.
15 / 18
Maria sends a Slack message to the team: 'I suspect that the new feature is causing increased latency. I take it that the performance testing hasn't been fully executed.' What is Maria's intention with 'I take it'?
'I take it' functions as an epistemic parenthetical indicating Maria's interpretation of the current situation. It suggests she believes something *likely* to be true based on her observations, but isn't stating it with absolute certainty, and is open to other perspectives.
16 / 18
John writes in a code review comment: "I suspect this increased error rate is related to the recent deployment of version 2.5. It's just a hunch, but I haven't seen any other immediate issues.". Which epistemic parenthetical best captures John's uncertainty?
'I suspect' expresses a tentative belief based on limited evidence. John isn't stating a fact but rather a possibility he's considering. Options A and C are too strong – 'insufficient' simply describes the data, while 'I think' is more assertive than appropriate given his disclaimer. Option D suggests a need for immediate action that hasn't been articulated.
17 / 18
Chloe (QA): 'I gather from the test results that the new UI component is intermittently failing to load images. I suspect it's related to network connectivity issues on mobile devices. I take it we should investigate further.'
'I gather' shows Chloe's interpretation of the test results. 'I suspect' provides her tentative explanation for the issue. Finally, 'I take it' signals that she needs more data to confirm or refute her hypothesis and directs attention towards further investigation – a key element of epistemic parentheticals.
18 / 18
Sarah is writing a PR description for a code change. She states: 'I suspect this new logging implementation will help us diagnose future performance issues.' What function does the epistemic parenthetical serve in this context?
Sarah's 'I suspect' indicates her belief about a *potential* benefit. The parenthetical expresses this tentative view, acknowledging the possibility that it might not fully solve the problem. It's a cautious suggestion, not a guaranteed outcome. Option A is incorrect because 'suspect' implies uncertainty; option C is overly critical; and option D is an unnecessary directive.
What will I practise in "Epistemic Parentheticals (I Think, I Suspect, I Gather) in Technical English — Grammar Exercise"?
Practise calibrated confidence with epistemic parentheticals like I suspect, I gather, and I take it in code reviews and incident reports. 5 exercises.
How many exercises are in this module?
This module has 18 multiple-choice exercises, each with instant feedback and a full explanation of the correct answer.
Is this exercise free to use?
Yes. Every exercise on CoderSlingo, including this one, is free to use with no account, sign-up, or paywall.
Do I need to create an account to do these exercises?
No account is required. Just click an option to answer — your score for this session is tracked automatically in the progress bar above.
What happens if I choose the wrong answer?
You'll immediately see which answer was correct, plus a full explanation covering the grammar rule and reasoning behind it — mistakes are where most of the learning happens.
Can I retry the exercises if I want a higher score?
Yes — use the "Try again" button on the results screen to reset and go through all the questions again.
Is my progress saved if I close the page?
No. Progress is tracked only for your current visit; reloading or leaving the page resets the counter. This keeps the exercise simple and account-free.
Where can I find more Grammar exercises?
Browse the full Grammar hub for related drills, or check the "Next up" link below to continue with a connected topic.
How is this different from reading an article on the same topic?
Articles explain grammar rules in prose; this exercise tests and reinforces those rules through active recall with immediate feedback — the two work best together.
Who writes these exercises?
Every exercise is written by the CoderSlingo team, drawing on real workplace English used in IT roles, then reviewed for accuracy and clarity.