5 exercises on reading and discussing DORA metrics and engineering productivity data in professional English.
DORA metrics — four key measures of engineering performance
Deployment Frequency: how often you deploy to production
Lead Time for Changes: commit to production time
Change Failure Rate: % of deployments causing incidents
MTTR: Mean Time to Recovery from incidents
0 / 5 completed
1 / 5
A team reports: "Our deployment frequency is 3.2 per day." According to DORA research, which performance tier does this represent?
DORA Deployment Frequency Tiers
The DORA (DevOps Research and Assessment) State of DevOps report classifies teams by deployment frequency:
Tier
Deployment Frequency
Elite
Multiple times per day (on demand)
High
Once per day to once per week
Medium
Once per week to once per month
Low
Once per month to once every 6 months
3.2 per day = multiple deployments per day = Elite tier.
Important context: High deployment frequency is only a positive signal when combined with low change failure rate and fast MTTR. Deploying frequently with a 30% failure rate is not elite performance.
Professional phrasing:
"We're in the elite tier for deployment frequency."
"Our deployment frequency is [X] per day — above the industry median."
2 / 5
A tech lead presents: "Our lead time for changes is currently 4.5 days." What does this metric measure, and how would you describe this in a meeting?
Lead Time for Changes — definition and benchmarks
Lead time for changes = the time from a code commit (or code merge) to that code running in production.
DORA tiers:
Tier
Lead Time
Elite
Less than 1 hour
High
1 day to 1 week
Medium
1 week to 1 month
Low
1 month to 6 months
4.5 days = within the 1 day to 1 week High performer range.
Professional phrasing:
"Our lead time is 4.5 days — in the high performer band."
"We're working to reduce lead time by improving our CI pipeline."
"Lead time spiked this sprint due to the infrastructure migration."
3 / 5
A sprint review shows: "Sprint velocity: 42 points. Previous 4 sprints average: 38 points." How would you describe this professionally?
Sprint velocity — describing it with nuance
Velocity is not simply good-higher/bad-lower. The professional interpretation acknowledges multiple explanations:
Genuine throughput increase: the team worked more efficiently
Estimation inflation: stories were estimated more generously (point inflation)
Simpler sprint composition: more small tasks, fewer large complex ones
Team size change: more people on the team this sprint
The 10.5% calculation: (42 - 38) / 38 × 100 = 10.5% above the 4-sprint average.
Professional velocity vocabulary:
"Velocity was [X] points — [above/below] our [N]-sprint rolling average of [Y]."
"Velocity variance is within normal bounds."
"The velocity spike may reflect improved flow or estimation changes — we'll watch the next sprint."
4 / 5
An engineering manager reports: "Our change failure rate is 8%." According to DORA benchmarks, what does this indicate?
Change Failure Rate (CFR) — DORA benchmarks
Change failure rate = % of deployments that cause a production incident, rollback, or hotfix.
DORA CFR tiers:
Tier
Change Failure Rate
Elite
0–5%
High
5–10%
Medium
10–15%
Low
15–45%+
8% = High performer tier — above average but not elite.
Context matters: A team deploying 10 times per day with 8% CFR has more actual failures than a team deploying once per week with 8% CFR. CFR must always be read alongside deployment frequency.
Professional phrasing:
"Our CFR is 8% — in the high performer range. We're working to push it below 5%."
"The change failure rate spiked this month — we'll review our pre-production testing coverage."
5 / 5
A developer says: "Our average PR open time is 3.8 days." Why is this metric important, and what does a high number suggest?
PR (Pull Request) Open Time — a lead time driver
PR open time is the time from PR creation to merge. It contributes directly to lead time for changes.
Why a high number is a concern:
Bottleneck signal: PRs sitting open for days suggests review is under-resourced or not prioritised