1 / 5
Which framing best justifies refactoring to a non-technical PM?
-
-
-
-
Tying refactoring to future delivery speed speaks the PM's language of outcomes rather than internal aesthetics.
2 / 5
Which sentence frames refactoring as risk reduction?
-
-
-
-
Linking the work to incident reduction gives the PM a concrete business reason (reliability, on-call cost) to approve it.
3 / 5
Tying the refactor to an upcoming feature shows it's ___, not optional cleanup.
-
-
-
-
Positioning refactoring as enabling work for a committed feature makes it part of delivering value, not a detour.
4 / 5
Proposing 'two days now to save a week later' offers a ___.
-
-
-
-
A time-boxed trade-off bounds the investment and quantifies the return, which is exactly what a PM needs to decide.
5 / 5
Which phrase avoids jargon that would lose a PM?
-
-
-
-
Plain-language impact ('slow and risky') lands with a PM; internal terminology obscures the business value you're arguing for.