Learn the vocabulary of two differently paced pointers detecting a loop in a linked list using constant memory.
0 / 5 completed
1 / 5
At standup, a dev mentions using two pointers moving through a linked list at different speeds, one step at a time and two steps at a time, to detect whether the list loops back on itself, using only constant extra memory. What is this technique called?
Cycle detection, via Floyd's tortoise and hare technique, is exactly this: it uses two pointers moving through a linked list at different speeds, one step at a time and two steps at a time, and if the list contains a cycle, the faster pointer eventually laps the slower one and they meet, detecting the loop using only constant extra memory. A hash collision is an unrelated hash-table concept about two keys sharing a bucket. This two-speeds-meet-if-a-loop-exists approach is exactly why cycle detection can find a loop without needing to store every visited node in a separate set.
2 / 5
During a design review, the team uses Floyd's tortoise-and-hare technique to detect a cycle in a linked list, specifically because it needs only two pointers and no auxiliary storage, unlike tracking every visited node in a separate set. Which capability does this provide?
The tortoise-and-hare technique here provides cycle detection in constant extra memory, since only two pointers are needed regardless of how long the list is, instead of storing every visited node in a separate set whose memory grows with the list's length. Storing every visited node in a separate set uses memory proportional to the list's length just to detect whether a cycle exists. This two-pointers-only, constant-space behavior is exactly why the tortoise-and-hare technique is favored when memory is a concern.
3 / 5
In a code review, a dev notices a linked-list cycle-detection function stores every visited node in a separate hash set and checks each new node against that set, instead of using the constant-space tortoise-and-hare technique with two differently paced pointers. What does this represent?
This is a missed cycle-detection-algorithm opportunity, since the tortoise-and-hare technique would detect the same cycle using only two pointers instead of a hash set whose memory grows with the list's length. A cache eviction policy is an unrelated concept about discarded cache entries. This hash-set-based-cycle-detection pattern is exactly the kind of unnecessary memory use a reviewer flags once the list can grow arbitrarily long.
4 / 5
An incident report shows a service ran out of memory while checking an extremely long linked list for a cycle, because the cycle-detection function stored every visited node in a hash set whose memory grew with the list's length instead of using the constant-space tortoise-and-hare technique. What practice would prevent this?
Switching to the tortoise-and-hare cycle-detection technique uses only two pointers and constant extra memory regardless of how long the list grows. Continuing to store every visited node in a hash set regardless of how long the list grows or how much memory that consumes is exactly what caused the out-of-memory issue described in this incident. This constant-space technique is the standard fix once a linked list is confirmed capable of growing extremely long.
5 / 5
During a PR review, a teammate asks why the team uses the tortoise-and-hare technique instead of simply storing every visited node in a hash set to detect a cycle, given that the hash-set approach is simpler to reason about. What is the reasoning?
The tortoise-and-hare technique detects a cycle using only constant extra memory regardless of the list's length, while the hash-set approach is simpler to reason about but uses memory proportional to the list's length just to track every visited node. This is exactly why the tortoise-and-hare technique is preferred when memory efficiency matters, while a hash set remains an easier-to-understand alternative when memory is not a concern.
What does the "Cycle Detection Algorithm Vocabulary" vocabulary exercise cover?
This exercise tests real IT vocabulary related to cycle detection algorithm vocabulary through 5 multiple-choice questions, each built from realistic workplace sentences rather than abstract definitions.
Is this vocabulary exercise free to use?
Yes. Every exercise on CoderSlingo, including this one, is completely free — no account, sign-up, or payment required.
How many questions does this exercise have?
This exercise has 5 questions. Each one shows a real-world sentence or scenario with multiple-choice options and an explanation once you answer.
What happens after I answer a question?
You'll see immediate feedback showing whether your answer was correct, along with a short explanation of why — then a button to move to the next question, and a full results screen at the end.
Can I retry the exercise if I get questions wrong?
Yes. Once you reach the results screen, click "Try again" to reset your answers and go through the exercise from the start as many times as you like.
Do I need to create an account to take this exercise?
No account is needed. Your answers are scored in your browser during the session — nothing is saved to a server, so you can jump straight in.
Is my progress saved if I leave the page?
No — progress within an exercise resets if you navigate away or reload. Each exercise is short enough to complete in a few minutes in one sitting.
Are these vocabulary exercises connected to other topics?
Yes — browse the full vocabulary exercises hub to find related modules covering adjacent IT topics and roles.
How is this different from reading a glossary or blog article?
Exercises like this one are active recall drills — you have to choose the correct term or phrasing yourself, which builds retention faster than passively reading a definition.
Where can I find more vocabulary exercises?
Browse the full Vocabulary exercises hub for hundreds of modules covering Agile, DevOps, security, databases, architecture, and more — organised by IT role and skill.