This set builds vocabulary for describing Windsurf's agentic coding mode and its workflow.
0 / 5 completed
1 / 5
At standup, a dev mentions using the Windsurf editor's built-in agentic mode that can autonomously plan and execute a multi-step coding task across the codebase. Which feature fits?
Cascade is Windsurf's agentic coding mode, capable of autonomously planning and executing multi-step tasks across a codebase, including reading files, making edits, and running commands, going beyond simple inline suggestions. Being built into the editor lets it draw on the same project context a developer sees while working. This agentic capability distinguishes it from a purely reactive autocomplete feature.
2 / 5
During a design review, the team wants to see which files Cascade plans to modify and why before it proceeds with an autonomous task. Which capability supports this?
Cascade surfaces a plan or reasoning trace outlining which files it intends to touch and why, before or while carrying out the task, letting a developer catch scope issues early rather than only discovering them after changes are already applied. This upfront visibility mirrors the trust-building pattern common across agentic coding tools. It supports a review-before-trust workflow rather than blind execution.
3 / 5
In a code review, a dev notices Cascade used the codebase's existing patterns and conventions when generating a new function rather than an unfamiliar style. What explains this consistency?
Cascade draws on the surrounding project context, including existing code conventions and patterns already present in the codebase, to generate new code that stays stylistically consistent rather than introducing an unfamiliar approach. This context awareness reduces the review burden of reconciling inconsistent styles afterward. It reflects a broader capability of IDE-integrated agents leveraging the project they're embedded in.
4 / 5
An incident report shows Cascade made changes across more files than the developer intended due to an ambiguously worded task description. What practice reduces this risk?
A narrowly scoped task description, paired with reviewing the complete diff before accepting the result, reduces the chance of an agent touching more of the codebase than intended. Vague instructions leave more room for the agent to interpret scope broadly. This discipline applies across agentic coding tools generally, not just Cascade specifically.
5 / 5
During a PR review, a teammate asks how Cascade differs from Windsurf's standard inline autocomplete suggestions. What is the distinction?
Standard autocomplete reactively suggests the next tokens as a developer types within one file, while Cascade operates at a higher level, planning and carrying out broader tasks that may span multiple files and involve command execution. This shifts the developer's role toward directing and reviewing rather than typing every change manually for larger tasks. The two features serve different points in the coding workflow.